# Truth or Dare Against God In the game of Truth or Dare, players are made to choose between two options: 1. **Truth.** Answering a particular question. 2. **Dare.** Performing a particular action. Against a perfect opponent, which option should one choose to minimise harm to themselves? This question can be answered by a simple minimax argument. Since a Dare is a request, and a Truth is a request for information, all requests for information are requests, but not all requests are requests for information. Thus, all Truths are Dares, but not all Dares are Truths. Let $T$ be the space of Truths, and $D$ be the space of Dares. Then, we have $T\subset D$. Thus, choosing Truth strictly shrinks the space of requests. A request can be harmful, and perfect opposition always issues a most harmful request. Clearly, a most harmful request in $T$ is at most as harmful as a most harmful request in $D$. Ergo, choosing Truth minimises harm.