In the game of Truth or Dare, players are made to choose between two options: 1. **Truth.** Answering a particular question. 2. **Dare.** Performing a particular action. Against perfect opposition, which option should one choose to minimise harm to themselves? Here is a minimax argument for Truth. --- A Dare is a request, and a Truth is a request for information. All requests for information are requests, but not all requests are requests for information. Thus, all Truths are Dares, but not all Dares are Truths. Let $T$ be the space of Truths, and $D$ be the space of Dares. Then, we have: $$ T\subset D $$ Thus, choosing Truth strictly reduces the space of issuable requests. A request can be harmful, and perfect opposition always issues a most harmful request. Clearly, a most harmful request $T$ is at most as harmful as a most harmful request in $D$. Thus, choosing Truth minimises harm.